Search: | Resources

newport business swansea business south wales business directory cardiff business directory cardiff business advice wales business consulting

911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77

internetmarketingsoftwaretools.com videos
internetmarketingsoftwaretools.com videos internetmarketingsoftwaretools.com videos
internetmarketingsoftwaretools.com videos

A short animation with video and photos illustrating the final moments of Flight 77 on September 11, 2001.

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: mikejwilson

Length: 06:16
Rating: 4.10
Views: 1499194

Tags: 77  9/11  911  boeing  case  conspiracy  flight  flight77  global  jet  missile  pentagon  plane  politics  solidworks  study  truth  war  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Dod damage report shows missing columns in areas the ASCE report shows no damage at all.The damage shown in the Dod report is impossible to explain by a plane hitting the building.This report was finished before the ASCE report, but was never meant for public viewing. The ASCE report was for the public.The ASCE didn't have full access, the Dod investigation was all first hand. The photos match the Dod report, damage behind column 1.
jizzmonger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Darrell Stafford Sees the plane over the Navy Annex, then come towards him, north of Citgo. He said this exact same thing in his CMH interview.He doesn't see the impact or fly over, because he is running at that point."~Wake~So then you cannot use this statement to decide whether or not the Plane actually hit the Pentagon so it's zero-sum in favor or against. The circumstantial evidence tells us the Plane hit.
kranski7 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Fruitloops and their "it can't have happened because in my mind it doesn't make sense". How arrogant. Have the maturity to look beyond what you "believe" could and couldn't have happened. If you guys were in Germany in the 30's you'd be argueing "There's no way Hitler burnt down that Reichstag, it doesn't make sense".
jizzmonger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Darrell Stafford Sees the plane over the Navy Annex, then come towards him, north of Citgo. He said this exact same thing in his CMH interview.He doesn't see the impact or fly over, because he is running at that point."~Wake~Heresay, dismissed.
jizzmonger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"You claim the Dod report is planted, not me."~Wakentoke~So you don't think the Department of Defense was in on the plot to destroy the Pentagon then, correct?
marksman500 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Waken,...2nd RequestSimple, rather than arguing about where Lagasse was looking and where he saw the plane, how about posting witnesses who Actually SAY they witnessed a fly over? Ya know, like these that actually witnessed the plane crash..I saw it fly right into the Pentagon It completely disappeared into the Pentagon.. Donley, Daryl..I just watched it hit the building. It exploded.. Boger, SeanYou said you had 12 witnesses? Let's see them!
wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Darrell Stafford Sees the plane over the Navy Annex, then come towards him, north of Citgo. He said this exact same thing in his CMH interview.He doesn't see the impact or fly over, because he is running at that point.
jizzmonger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Kranstard, I am not calling you names I am just putting a descriptive word at the end of your normal name to identify the character of the person I am quoting. Like:KranstardKransidiotKransnumbnutsKransbedwetterKransfruitcakeKrandipshitKransflunkyEtc..All those would be names that identify who and what you are.
wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
jizzmonger (20 minutes ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply | Spam "The Dod report shows column damage impossible to explain. Missing columns next to undamaged columns then missing columns. Debris doesn't skip a few, take a few out, as shown in the Dod report"~Wake~This information also cannot be used to determine if a 757 or Flight 77 hit by your account because it also planted. ------You claim the Dod report is planted, not me.
marksman500 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Kranski..."He also doesn't think a planted FDR would prove a conspiracy. HA HA HA HA!"..----Why would someone plant evidence in the pentagon that would reveal the plane never hit it? Doe's that make sense to you?

SouthWalesBusinessWebsites © 2007 All Rights Reserved.