dewzs (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The FDA is it's own government. The FDA runs America. Anything that the government tells you to take or do, you RUN the other way!!!

wildman4401 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Man what are you reading? What a twisted interpretation. Why was the FDA was concerned enough to make Merck study it further then and report back in 07, as condition of approval. Noone has seen that report.

greeneyedsteamengine (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Heres your proof here from Judical Watch: judicalwatch(dot)org/gardasil You can find out who Judical Watch is through Wikipedia. Good luck to you.

greeneyedsteamengine (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Yes, if anyone dies from any vaccine, even if its the Flue shot it should be discontinued because its not safe. Its great to be 18 and have all the answers isn't it? By the way, I liked your "Tres Chicas" video. It was very silly but then again, what can you expect from an 18 year old? Good luck.

Anesthesiakk (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

They can't link the deaths directly to Gardasil. There could have been pre-existing conditions. People die from the FLU SHOT! Does that mean we should stop giving it? No. Where is your MD? How much college did you go through huh? I trust my doctor who obviously has more experience then you do while you sit there and bash something that you can never experience because you are a man.There is already a new, safer drug that is up for FDA approval. So quit complaining and do your damn research.

greeneyedsteamengine (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

21 deaths from Gardasil so far Anesthesiakk. Please stay away from this poison.

greeneyedsteamengine (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

21 deaths from Gardasil vaccinations so far. This stuff is out and out poison.

itzAplatypus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

i believe it

sinan32121 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

MOST WOMEN....not all! PS Keep in mind that science is always evolving. Within only five years (since 2003) new developments can turn the facts on their heads. So unless this information is from a person in the field, who has been monitoring each and every development on the subject, he should not be making such claims. I am not saying its impossible that he's right, just that he wouldn't be one to know. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if he were (by luck) right given the history of the FDA.

Undurkhaan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What do you mean with "FDA knew HPV did not cause cervical cancer in 2003"? Haw can you say tha? any evidence?